Smart Meter Opt-Out Passed -- With a Cost

California Public Utilities Commission approves plan to allow PG&E to charge those customers who choose to opt out of the Smart Meter program.

Over boos and hisses from opponents of PG&E's Smart Meter program, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) voted today to of recieving the controversial wireless digital meters.

In a unanimous decision, the CPUC adopted a set of program modifications, which allow PG&E to recover costs associated with replacing Smart Meters or letting customers keep older analog devices.

The CPUC said that the Smart Meters are meant to help reduce energy consumption by wirelessly monitoring usage and allowing customers to opt-in to energy conservation programs. .

The metering systems are being installed as part of a nationwide "smart grid" in 25 states around the country, CPUC President Michael Peevey said.

Opponents of the meters argue that the meters emit harmful electromagnetic
signals and radiation, and that FCC standards don't go far enough. Critics have also raised concerns about the privacy and data security issues related to the meters, and about .

Peevey quoted studies by the Federal Communications Commission and , which concluded that potential negative health effects from SmartMeters had not been "identified or confirmed."

Customers electing to keep analog meters will be assessed an initial fee of $75 and a monthly charge of $10. Low-income customers can opt out of the Smart Meter program for an initial fee of $10 and an ongoing monthly charge of $5.

Speakers from across Northern California packed the commission CPUC auditorium in San Francisco, some demanding that the CPUC reconsider charging fees for customers who opt-out of the program, others demanding an end to wireless meters altogether.

Residents of Santa Cruz, San Francisco, Marin and San Luis Obispo counties claimed that SmartMeters were responsible for headaches, dizziness, insomnia, and heart palpitations.

Fairfax, along with unincorporated Marin, continue to have a . In Fairfax, however, . In unincorporated Marin, the Sheriff and District Attorney have said they have no intention of enforcing the ordinance, but in Fairfax the moratorium has more backing from the town. It is unclear, though, if PG&E begins installing the meters in Fairfax, what steps the town will take to stop the utility.

The CPUC has said they will consider other concerns in a Phase 2 hearing, including the issue of community-wide opt-outs.

Fairfax Councilman Larry Bragman urged the CPUC to enact a moratorium on installations while considering these issues.

"Given the level of concern in our communities, there will undoubtedly be many thousands of customers who will elect to opt-out based upon individual medical concerns, and they should not, and cannot, be forced to pay a fee to do so," Bragman also stated in a press release.

Peevey said that the CPUC was responding to the concerns raised by the public by offering an avenue to opt out of the SmartMeter program.

"For those of you who want to opt out, you now have the option," Peevey said.

Do you think the paid opt-out goes far enough?

-- Bay City News contributed to this article

valeri hood February 03, 2012 at 06:58 AM
That's about it- short and sweet and to the point!
Rico February 03, 2012 at 06:56 PM
There is more to this decision by the PUC to allow another rate increase for refusing a new AMR wireless meter. A source closely involved with PUC matters told me that there is a hidden rate increase that will be forced on customers who have analog meters to compensate for the facts that PG&E won't be able to implement peak pricing schemes on customers because PG&E will not be able to discern at what time electricity is being used. I will report back when I know more of the details.
Bill McGee February 03, 2012 at 08:07 PM
Ricardo - anyone can view thier hourly energy usage online. Your use of the term real-time is misleading. One can view their hourly, daily, monthly usage online with a 24-hour delay. Who cares that you must wait 24 hours? No one. Also, most people already have an internet connection, computer, monitor etc. Your posts are just as much as an attempt to mislead as PG&E's ads. Two wrongs don't make a right. Truth prevails Pulipaca.
Bill McGee February 03, 2012 at 08:08 PM
right Ricardo...the little birdie told you.
Vera Grigorian February 17, 2012 at 02:06 AM
Charging a set-up and monthly service fee for those who wish to opt out of the Smart Meter Installation is PG&E's way of telling us that we really cannot opt out. I do not trust anything that PG&E says to us customers about the benefits of their Smart Meters. I don't want one and I should not be charged monthly to not have one. My family can save energy without a Smart Meter, thank you very much. Certainly, if people are complaining of headaches and other symptoms, the safety of these devices must be investigated more thoroughly by an outside party. We would definitely opt out were there no fee imposed.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »